Empirical Enquiry and Critical Thought Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Empirical Enquiry and Critical Thought - Essay ExampleUsing the chemical formula of categorical imperative Kant suggested we therefore dare to give our ring, because there is still value in it, as tantamount to how we conceptualise and make our choice. We make promises because we think we have to fulfill them. We therefore have the positive choice to accomplish what we need to accomplish based on what we have promised. This is a remarkable mark of a true(p) will if we want to come to consider the whole idea of Kant concerning the ethics associated with duty. For Kant, in understanding the moral requirements, it is important that we act not out of inclination, but out of duty because doing so the latter is inherent of a good will. The work at hand considers some thoughts how might Kants example of the promise be useful in contemporary society together with the theory linked to this and how this might have meaningful application in modern day event. Moral Law A spurious promise t herefore according to Kant is a contradiction to the moral law, but what makes it a large conflict is not the associated consequence, but the way on how people think and make choices (Kerstein, 2004, p.168 Jecker, 2011, p.151). Kant believed that there is moral law that governs standard of rationality leading us to the implementation of moral requirements. In line with this moral law, irrational acts are therefore leading bitkind to immorality. I agree with the idea of Kant and in the same(p) way as how Locke and Hobbes, the other philosophers argued that the standard of rationality paves the way for moral requirements (De La Sierra, 2012, p.270 Morris, 1999, p.185 Paul et al., 2008, p.223). Understanding the idea of Kant leads me to the thought that he has a good point why he argued that we should not look at the consequence of an action, but rather on the actual intention prior to doing it. Suppose a business man owed a debt to a business partner and signed a promissory note to pay the actual cash incurred at a specified time and amount. This business man has a principle that he could just get around his obligation by adhering to a false promise and continue to generate financial gain out of it. The key idea in this given example concerns whether the business man who is indebted to pay is musical accompaniment under the principle of moral law. Certainly, the mans false promise is out of inclination and not out of duty. If all would make a false promise to make advantage of it, there would certainly come a time that everyone would not take promise seriously. In other words, the business mans ultimate principle is a contradiction itself, because he could never gain from it, as the ultimate point of his inclination in the first place. In this case, if we based it on the idea of Kant, it is not the consequence that would tell us about a morally important thing, but the business persons way of thinking, something invisible, but essential in understanding the m oral law. Garrett (2006) showed that the categorical imperative, just as how Kant explained would make it possible for us to understand the moral law. affair of Ethics We can only generate general or substantial understanding of Kants example of promise if we come to consider his theory of the indebtedness of Ethics. As already stated, we need to understand what moral